On April 29, the NCAA agreed to a proposed class action settlement, requiring it to make both monetary payments and major rule changes on student athletes’ ability to receive prize money prior to college enrollment. [1] The proposed settlement now awaits final approval in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.[2]
In Brantmeier, et al. v. NCAA, the
Read More NCAA Settlement Sets Aside Rule Banning Student Athletes From Accepting Outside Prize MoneyWiggin and Dana’s Robert M. Langer and Zeynep E. Vallance, together with Quyen Truong of Covington & Burling LLP and Alundai Benjamin of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, each former UConn Law School students of Mr. Langer, have co-authored the Connecticut Chapter of the Sixth Edition of State Antitrust Practice and Statutes (SAPS). This edition marks a milestone as the first chapter to be released
Read More Wiggin and Dana Co-Authors SAPS (6th Edition) Connecticut Chapter — First ABA Antitrust eBook ReleasedOn June 6, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved a proposed settlement agreement [VZ1] between the National Collegiate Athletics Association (“NCAA”), the Power Five Conferences and student athletes, effectively paving the way for name, likeness, and image (“NIL”) compensation for student athletes.[1] The approval comes nearly five years after student athletes filed the class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Sherman Act related
Read More Settled Yet Uncertain: Final Approval of NCAA NIL Settlement Opens Doors to More Antitrust ChallengesOn April 1, the Federal Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) new Trade Regulation Rule (“Rule”) to combat those that impersonate government entities went into effect. The Rule enables the Commission to directly pursue federal action against scammers who may face civil liability to return money stolen from consumers. This Rule is not simply advisory, but rather the Rule has the force and effect of law. If one
Read More Federal Trade Commission’s New Trade Regulation RulePartner Benjamin Diessel, Senior Counsel Robert Langer and Associate Zeynep Aydogan authored a piece titled, “FTC Merger Policy Shifts May Spur Uncertainty And Risk” for Law360. The article discusses the recent measures that the Federal Trade Commission has taken to “reshape its enforcement priorities for review of mergers and acquisitions.”
Traditionally, new policies have been adopted jointly by the FTC and the U.S.
Read More “FTC Merger Policy Shifts May Spur Uncertainty And Risk”The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) has recently taken bold measures to reshape the Commission’s enforcement priorities for review of mergers and acquisitions. The FTC shares jurisdiction over such reviews with the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Accordingly, new policies have historically been adopted jointly by the FTC and DOJ. Several recent actions of the FTC, however, have been undertaken unilaterally in a stark
Read More The FTC’s Recent Unilateral Changes in Its Merger Policies Creates Both Uncertainty and Increased Risk