On August 24th, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., affirming a 2014 district court ruling that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has the authority to regulate cybersecurity lapses. The Third Circuit also held that Wyndham – the global hospitality giant — had fair notice that its cybersecurity practices could
Read More Third Circuit Affirms FTC’s Ability to Bring Cybersecurity Enforcement ActionsUnilateral Price Policies in the Contact Lens Industry: Can Manufacturers Be Forced to Sell to Every Retailer?
Posted on
It is a cardinal rule of antitrust that—absent very limited exceptions—parties can do business with, or refuse to do business with, whomever they choose. The Supreme Court solidified that premise in United States v. Colgate & Co.1 and has reiterated it time and again.2 Recent state legislation and lawsuits arising in the contact lens industry are threatening to dismantle that bedrock principle…
Read More Unilateral Price Policies in the Contact Lens Industry: Can Manufacturers Be Forced to Sell to Every Retailer?Competition News, June 2015
Posted on
Unilateral Price Policies in the Contact Lens Industry: Can Manufacturers Be Forced to Sell to Every Retailer?
It is a cardinal rule of antitrust that – absent very limited exceptions – parties can do business, or refuse to do business, with whomever they choose. The Supreme Court solidified that premise in United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300, 307 (1919), and has…
Read More Competition News, June 2015North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC — What Hath the Supreme Court Wrought?
Posted on
The federalism debate has continued to serve as a point of controversy and division in American politics and jurisprudence.1 The balance of power between the states and the federal government has shifted over time reflecting the realities of this debate. Historically, the states were thought to possess the exclusive power to regulate ‘‘their purely internal affairs” through the exercise of their police powers.2…
Read More North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC — What Hath the Supreme Court Wrought?FTC Announces New Premerger-Notification and Interlocking-Directorate Thresholds
Posted on
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced its annual adjustment of the thresholds for premerger notification filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR), as well its adjustment for the thresholds for prohibitions on certain interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act.
The new HSR thresholds will be effective thirty days after publication in the Federal Register. Publication is expected sometime during the week of…
Read More FTC Announces New Premerger-Notification and Interlocking-Directorate ThresholdsFCC Gives Companies Six Months to Seek Retroactive Waiver of Fax Ad Rule
Posted on
In a long-awaited decision, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) announced on October 30th that fax advertisements must include a detailed notice that describes the recipient’s right to opt out of receiving future fax ads—even if the recipient consented to receive the fax. But, in an unusual concession, the agency also announced that it would retroactively waive the opt-out notice requirement for companies that had petitioned…
Read More FCC Gives Companies Six Months to Seek Retroactive Waiver of Fax Ad RuleFTC Publishes Revised Guides for Advertising Allowances and Other Merchandising Payments
Posted on
Recently, for the first time in 24 years, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published revisions to its guidelines on advertising allowances and other promotional payments and services, widely known as the Fred Meyer Guides (“Guides”). Originally published in 1969, the Guides explain Sections 2(d) and 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act, which require a seller that pays for or provides promotional allowances to customers to do…
Read More FTC Publishes Revised Guides for Advertising Allowances and Other Merchandising PaymentsTermination for Convenience Under the Uniform Commercial Code
Posted on
Between suppliers and manufacturers, planning for the termination of a supply agreement during its negotiation may seem counterintuitive, awkward, or perhaps insignificant. Termination discussions often take a back seat in the conference room where the negotiating energy is spent primarily on price, quality, and delivery terms. As one court observed, termination is typically “of little interest or concern to the parties” so long as they…
Read More Termination for Convenience Under the Uniform Commercial CodeNew Guidance on Providing Financial Services to Medical Marijuana Businesses
Posted on
Connecticut recently awarded licenses to four medical marijuana producers, marking the beginning of Connecticut’s legal medical marijuana industry. Although medical marijuana businesses are licensed and heavily regulated by the State of Connecticut,[1] they have had difficulty securing basic financial services due to ambiguities in federal policy. Financial institutions are wary of servicing such clients owing to the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act and…
Read More New Guidance on Providing Financial Services to Medical Marijuana BusinessesSupreme Court Limits Removal of State Attorney General Actions to Federal Court
Posted on
Connecticut recently awarded licenses to four medical marijuana producers, marking the beginning of Connecticut’s legal medical marijuana industry. Although medical marijuana businesses are licensed and heavily regulated by the State of Connecticut,[1] they have had difficulty securing basic financial services due to ambiguities in federal policy. Financial institutions are wary of servicing such clients owing to the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act and…
Read More Supreme Court Limits Removal of State Attorney General Actions to Federal Court