The GLBA only applies to individuals who obtain financial products or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, and does not apply to companies or individuals who obtain financial products or services for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes.

On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) became law, bringing important changes to the regulation of consumer privacy protection in the financial services industry. Title…

Read More Important Notice regarding The Gramm-Leach Bliley Act

In the same month that the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice released their Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors (“Collaboration Guidelines”), the New York State Attorney General won a decisive victory in a case that challenged a collaborative arrangement between two not-for-profit competitor hospitals.

Resources

Reprinted with permission from Matthew Bender’s Antitrust Report, October 2000

Read More Ongoing Lessons From Poughkeepsie

The role of state attorneys general in the development of competition policy in the U.S. continues to grow and evolve. In an increasing array of venues, state enforcers, often under the aegis of the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) Multistate Antitrust Task Force (NAAG Task Force), have become an essential component in the antitrust risk assessment for business transactions within the US.

Click the…

Read More State Attorneys General: The Third Prong in the Antitrust Triad

The Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and state attorneys general, as any antitrust aficionado knows, have dramatically improved the level of communication, cooperation, and coordination among themselves in the investigation and prosecution of antitrust violations during the past decade.1 Two important examples of such coordination are the 1998 Protocol for Coordination in Merger Investigations Between the Federal…

Read More Should the Antitrust Division, the FTC, and State Attorneys General Formally Allocate the Market for Antitrust Enforcement?

Non-profit hospitals and other non-profit or charitable health care organizations may be able to claim a limited exemption from the antitrust laws for the purchase and resale of supplies for their own use under the Non-Profit Institutions Act (15 U.S.C. § 13c.).

In general, the Robinson-Patman Act prohibits the contemporaneous sale in interstate commerce of commodities of like grade and quality for use or resale within…

Read More Recent Developments Concerning the Non-Profit Institutions Act

Introduction

The Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) released a revised version of their “Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care” (“Guidelines”) on August 28, 1996. While all nine Statements contained in the Guidelines were reissued, only Statement 8 on physician network joint ventures and Statement 9 on multiprovider networks were revised. A seemingly…

Read More The Revised Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care May Substantially Advance the Creation of New Provider Networks

While all nine statements in the Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care were re-issued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Aug. 28, only Statement 8 on physician network joint ventures and Statement 9 on multiprovider networks were actually revised.

The revisions to Statements 8 and 9 am intended to give health care providers greater flexibility in…

Read More New Guidelines Try to Reverse Perceived “Chilling Effect’ on Network Development

The communications industry is experiencing an unprecedented wave of mergers and acquisitions. Merging entities and their counsel are, of course, resigned to the fact that federal regulatory and antitrust enforcement agencies, as well as state public service commissions, must be consulted before most are finalized. It can, however, be unsettling, when the same merger that is being scrutinized by the “feds” also draws the attention…

Read More Coordinated State Antitrust Enforcement: Federalism in the ’90s

BACKGROUND DISCUSSION

The Antitrust Guidelines for Intellectual Property (hereinafter “IP”) Licensing (hereinafter “the Guidelines”), issued jointly by the Justice Department and the FTC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Agencies”) on April 6, 1995, will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the drafting, negotiation, and subsequent scrutiny, by the government and private citizens, of domestic licensing arrangements, as well as multinational licenses having an impact…

Read More The Impact of the New Antitrust Guidelines on Licensing

About Our Practice

Clients turn to Wiggin and Dana’s Antitrust and Technology Disputes Practice Group because of our broad experience litigating and advising on a wide variety of complex antitrust and technology issues.
Learn More