A 1993 article in this Journal reported, without fanfare, a federal district court ‘s holding that a “franchisor and franchisee were legally incapable of conspiring” in restraint of trade.1 Since that time, two other district courts and two courts of appeals have echoed that decision.2
Resources
Reprinted with permission from the Franchise Law Journal (American Bar Association), Volume 23, Number 1, Summer 2003